Category: Antennas

Radio antennas used at EI4HQ

  • The End Fed Half Wave Antenna

    The End Fed Half Wave Antenna

    My trusty 20M GP antenna, is a much-loved and proven favourite for operations away from the home QTH. Recent experience has made clear however that It’s not ideal for POTA, SOTA and other short term /P activations. It’s relatively heavy at about 2kgs, and it takes about 15 minutes to set up. Of course, it’s also a single band antenna. That, above all else is a bit limiting.

    In my many forays into the world of antennas over the years, I’d occasionally come across the “End Fed Half Wave” antenna – EFHW – but I didn’t pay much attention. I finally did take notice when I went looking for a POTA antenna that would perform some way efficiently, while also being light-weight, multi-band and easy to deploy.

    When I started looking for an alternative to the 20M GP, I quickly learned that the EFHW is a favourite among POTA and SOTA operators. Despite the wisdom of the herd, I was a bit skeptical of the claims being made for the EFHW. If I’m honest, it almost sounded too good to be true. Nonetheless, given how easy an EFHW is to make, I reckoned I’d nothing to lose by putting one together and trying it out.

    I’ll summarise making one first and then talk about my early experiences with using it after. Spoiler, I’m very impressed.

    The 5W 40M-10M EFHW antenna gets it’s first outing at IE-0246

    EFHW Basics:

    • An EFHW antenna is a half wavelength long on the lowest band of operation. In other words, it’s a half wave dipole on that band.
    • Unlike the most common dipole variant however, an EFHW is not fed in the middle but instead it’s fed at one of the ends.
    • Feeding a dipole at one end and not in the middle, means a much higher impedence at the feed point. To match an EFHW to a 50ohm transmitter, a 49:1 un-un is used at the feedpoint.
    • An EFHW needs some sort of counterpoise or connection to earth. It doesn’t need very much at all – the wisdom is that a counterpoise a mere 0.05 wavelength long on the fundamental frequency, or a short stake into the ground, is sufficient. The antenna does need something however. If you don’t provide a counterpoise, it’ll make use of whatever it can find electrically e.g. the feedline coax shield. If there really is no counterpoise or earth available, then the antenna won’t work. It’s better to have an explicit counterpoise or earth connection as otherwise, you may find the antenna is inconsistent from a tuning perspective in use, and it could result in “RF in the shack” issues at the rig. That’s not something you want, particularly if you’re running higher power.
    • An EFHW will resonate on even and odd harmonics of it’s fundamental frequency. As such, it can be used as a multiband antenna.
    • If using an EFHW as a multiband antenna, adding some capacitance at the feed point can help with resonance on the higher bands.
    • Because an EFHW is fed at one end, it’s an easy antenna to get up in the air, that’s a big part of its’ attraction. An EFHW can be put up as a horizontal wire, as a vertical wire, as a sloper or as an upside down L. I’m intentionally not using the term “inverted L”, to avoid confusion with that antenna type. The EFHW if put up as an upside down L, looks physically like an inverted L but it works very differently.

    Design Criteria for my EFHW Antenna:

    • Max Transmit Power: 5W.
    • Bands: 40M, 20M, 15M and 10M.
    • Insulated radiating wire so it can be run directly over tree limbs, through bushes etc.
    • Compatible with my existing “/T” and “/P” equipment, so a PL-259 connector at the antenna feedpoint.
    • Lightweight and compact.
    • Weather proof.
    • Low profile – no bright orange wire or other “glizty” parts that might draw attention.

    Parts List:

    • A length of insulated wire for the antenna wire, that’s a half wavelength long on the lowest frequency you wish to operate on. I went for 40M, so I used circa 22 metres (67′) of wire. I used one strand of twin field telephone wire. That stuff is very strong, light and low profile. It’s also almost impossible to tangle up.
    • A second length of wire for the counterpoise. Make that about 0.05 wavelength long on the lowest frequency you wish to operate on. For 40M, that’s 2 metres (3.3′). Alternativley, make a ground rod. I went with a ground rod made from a 250mm (10″) length of aluminium rod I had lying around.
    • Type 43 toroid(s). How many and how big they are will depend on how much power you wish to run. As I was only building for 5W, I used FT23-43 toroids. I might have gotten away with even smaller. I used two of them, glued together with superglue. At 5W, one toroid would almost certainly been enough but seeing as how I had two to hand, I decided to take a “belts & braces” approach.
    • A 100pF capacitor. This is optional but helps the antenna to resonate and in a useful place, on the higher bands i.e. 15M and 10M in the case of my antenna. Again as the antenna is only for QRP use, I was able to use a 50V rated capacitor from the junk box. For higher powers, you’ll want to use a higher rated capacitor.
    • A suitable enclosure for the feedpoint connections. I used a black plastic box with a screw on lid measuring about 80mm (3″) x 40mm (1.5″) x 20mm (0.8″). Sometimes with ferrite based components, you want to avoid using a metal enclosure as it could alter the performance characteristics of that component. I don’t think this is one of those situations but I’m open to correction on that…
    • A panel mount SO239 for the coax connection.
    • A means to connect the antenna wire and the counterpoise/ground. I used M5 nuts & bolts and suitable eyes soldered onto the antenna wire and counterpoise/ground wire.

    Making the Antenna:

    • Cut the radiating wire a bit longer than calculated, to have a bit extra for tuning purposes. Cut the counterpoise and/or make up the ground rod.
    • Drill required holes in the feedpoint box.
    • Mount the coax connector.
    • Wind the 49:1 un-un. This is the only bit that requires some care. Rather than repeat excellent guidance that’s already on the internet by other kind souls, take a look at e.g. MM0ZIF’s instructions, Gordon Gibby’s instructions or KM1NDY’s instructions (thanks folks!).
    • Connect the antenna wire to the secondary wire of the un-un, one end of the primary wire pair to the counterpoist/ground and the remaining primary wire to the antenna feed point.
    • Solder the 100pF capacitor across the antenna feedpoint and the counterpoise/ground point.
    • Box it up. Tune it up. Have fun!
    The EFHW from another angle, at IE-0246

    So, what’s the EFHW like in use? I humbly concede my arrogance & stupidity in not accepting herd wisdom; the EFHW is a wonderful antenna for /P activities of all sorts and is a surprisingly effective performer. Albeit I’ve only two POTA activiations with it to date IE-0043 and IE-0246, it’s very apparent that this antenna is a keeper. The EFHW is one of those antennas that just wants to work. It’s very tolerant of how it’s mounted and it takes mere moments to get it airborne. So far, I’ve used it only in an upside down L configuration. I’ll set it up vertically and horizontally in due course but I don’t expect any change in performance.

    I’m so impressed with the EFHW, that I’m building two more; a 100W 40M-10M version for “/T” operations using 3 FT37-43 toroids for the 49:1 un-un, and a 200W 80-10M version for permanent installation at home as a secondary/backup antenna. For that version I’ll be using 2 FT50-43 toroids for the un-un.

    Once I’ve more use experience with all three EFHW antennas, I’ll update this post.

  • Back to Basics – rediscovering the Dipole

    Back to Basics – rediscovering the Dipole

    Having decided to completely revamp the shack, one of the first questions to arise was what antennas am I going to put up? I’ve been using a 3 element tribander for 10, 15 and 20 metres mounted on my specially reinforced chimney, and variants of wire verticals on the lower bands. You can see details of the antennas I’ve had on the station page. Most antennas I’ve used up to now have performed reasonably well from a radio perspective but durability has been a problem.

    Decisions for the low bands i.e. 160, 80, 40 and 30 metres weren’t hard to make. I’m going to build an updated version of my successful and proven inverted L for 80 and 160 metres so it includes 40 and 30 metres as well. The 80 and 160 metre version has performed very well and adding 40 metres is an easy option to keep me on that band; 40 metres isn’t a huge priority band for me over the next while as I’ve my highest DXCC country total on that band and will be concentrating elsewhere for the foreseeable future. I’ve never really been active on 30 metres up to now, so any half decent antenna will do at this stage. If past vertical performance at this site is anything to go by, it’ll be a decent performer on 30m. For receive on the lower HF frequencies I’ve a very trustworthy K9AY that I am certainly going to keep, though it needs reconditioning. I also have a partially constructed N/S bi-directional beverage for 80 metres that I will finish and I’ll be installing another at more or less 90 degrees to the first. I’m very fortunate to have both the space to install such an array and accommodating neighbours who will permit me to do so.

    These criteria were ordered based on the specific needs I have. Others will of course have different needs and different constraints and priorities but this is how design goals fell out for me on this occasion. I want a station that will stay on air in the worst Winter storms we get, that won’t require a huge amount of time or money to maintain, that has a relatively low visual profile, that performs reasonably and doesn’t cost me a fortune. Many hams will be surprised that performance is only 3rd on the list.

    It came down to a simple choice for me – do I want more time on the air with a less efficient antenna or better performance with more enforced periods off air. I’ve never spent enough time on the air and want to change that, so the durability and longevity goals won out over on-air performance.

    The challenge was what to do for the higher bands i.e. 20 through 6 metres? I wanted a change from the tribander partly because I live in a very exposed spot that is open to storms from the North Atlantic in the Winter; the highest wind speed recorded since I’ve lived here (2000) is 75 knots (139kph/86mph). Although thankfully I’ve never had a serious failure on the tribander, just a few element tips coming off now and again, I tend not to sleep that well when the storms go through. The tribander is also getting to end of life and I just thought it’d be nice to hear the radio World through different ears for the next while. Though I’ve led something of a charmed existence with the tribander, looking back over the last decade I’ve realised that durable antennas have been a real challenge – I’ve had lots of other antennas fail over the years – and consequently I’ve spent alot of time and effort keeping wire and aluminium in the air due equipment failures. My tribander rotator also died earlier this year and that, along with the remains of many past antennas I came across when cleaning out my shed over the Summer got me thinking about design criteria for my new antenna farm. After some mulling over, I came up with the following:

    1. Durability (maximise survivability)
    2. Longevity (minimise maintenance)
    3. Performance (reasonable efficiency and directionality)
    4. Visibility (low visual profile)
    5. Cost (keep it some way reasonable)

    Criteria established and site surveyed, it was time to ask the tough question; what antenna(s) for each band from 20 metres to 10 metres? I dug out my old reliable favourite antenna book, the ARRL Antenna Book and did some revision. I also spent along time online looking at various options. I thought about my site and my priorities. I read extensively. I slept on it for many weeks. I did alot of doodling. I walked the land over and over again. I got a crick in my neck looking upwards to my various antenna supports – my tall house and various trees around my site. I considered and reconsidered various configurations. A possible solution emerged after a number of weeks and many possibilities had been considered and rejected. From that point on, while other possible configurations bubbled up, I kept coming back to that particular configuration. In the end, I couldn’t escape a conclusion that was staring me in the face.

    The antenna arrangement that would best fit my situation was a suite of dipoles for 6 through 20 metres, consisting of a pair of dipoles one half wavelength high for each band, erected at right angles to one another and each antenna fed independently to maximise flexibility; I could feed either antenna on a particular band independently or together, in effect giving me two or four beam directions. The setup, if done right would be very durable, require little maintenance, perform well, wouldn’t be terribly visible if done right and wouldn’t cost that much either. An added bonus is I’d have 100% redundancy on each band so if I did have an antenna failure I wouldn’t end up off air as a result on the affected band.

    The focus since making that decision has been on engineering the most durable, lowest maintenance, least visible solution I can come up with. I’ve put quite a bit of work into identifying antenna parts such as pullies, mounting points for the house and trees, suitable guy line, antenna wire, dipole centres, toroids for the 1:1 current baluns at the feed points and coax cable. You can read about the dipoles antenna I’m building at the projects page. There’s something very satisfying about ending up with such a ubiquitous antenna as being the appropriate solution. At this stage of my radio journey, it feels right to be going back to basics so to speak. The resulting station if hooked up to a 100w transmitter will constitute something of a standard candle station on-air as well, a nice bonus. It’s good to have reference points out there, part of the reason I monitor the NCDXF beacons so closely.